CVE-2011-0745
Description
SugarCRM before 6.1.3 does not properly handle reloads and direct requests for a warning page produced by a certain duplicate check, which allows remote authenticated users to discover (1) the names of customers via a ShowDuplicates action to the Accounts module, reachable through index.php; or (2) the names of contact persons via a ShowDuplicates action to the Contacts module, reachable through index.php.
Predictions
Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.
Mitigations
No mitigations published for this CVE yet.
The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or — if you've already worked around this in production — publish your fix to the community-verified tier.
✚ Propose a mitigation on Community → Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here withsource_tier=community-verified.
Exploits
Public proof-of-concept code below. AS-IS, for defenders and authorised testing only.
Exploit-DB
SugarCRM 6.1.1 - Information Disclosure
Application impact
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | {"endIncluding":"6.1.2"} | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.0f | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.0g | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1a | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1b | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1c | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1d | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1e | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.1f | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 1.5d | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 2.0.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 2.0.1a | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 2.0.1c | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 3.0.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 3.5 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 3.5.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.0.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.2 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.2.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.5.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.5.0f | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.5.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.5.1i | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 4.5.1o | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.0.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.0.0h | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.0.0k | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.1.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.1.0-beta | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.1c | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.1l | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2.0g | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2a | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2c | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2d | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2e | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2f | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2g | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.2h | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5.2 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5.3 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5.4 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 5.5a | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.0.1 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.0.2 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.0.3 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.1.0 | |
| sugarcrm | sugarcrm | 6.1.1 | |
References
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8141
- http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2011-002
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/517027/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46885
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025222
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0675
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66110
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8141
- http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2011-002
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/517027/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46885
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025222
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0675
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66110
CWEs
CWE-20
Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.
Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.