CVE-2013-0169
Description
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue.
Predictions
Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.
Mitigations
No mitigations published for this CVE yet.
The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or — if you've already worked around this in production — publish your fix to the community-verified tier.
✚ Propose a mitigation on Community → Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here withsource_tier=community-verified.
OS impact
Debian Fixed 5 releases
| Version | Status | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| trixie | Fixed | 1.48+dfsg-2 |
| sid | Fixed | 1.48+dfsg-2 |
| forky | Fixed | 1.48+dfsg-2 |
| bullseye | Fixed | 1.48+dfsg-2 |
| bookworm | Fixed | 1.48+dfsg-2 |
Application impact
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | {"startIncluding":"0.9.8","endIncluding":"0.9.8x"} | |
| oracle | openjdk | 1.6.0 | |
| oracle | openjdk | 1.7.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.10.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.10.1 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.11.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.11.1 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.12.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.12.1 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.13.1 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.14.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.14.2 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.14.3 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 0.99 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.0.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.1.0 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.1.1 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.1.2 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.1.3 | |
| polarssl | polarssl | 1.1.4 | |
References
- http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/02/20/security-icedtea-2-1-6-2-2-6-2-3-7-for-openjdk-7-released/
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/101366.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-02/msg00020.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00020.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136396549913849&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136432043316835&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136439120408139&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136733161405818&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137545771702053&w=2
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0782.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0783.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0833.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1455.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1456.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53623
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55108
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55139
CWEs
CWE-310
Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.
Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.