CVE-2026-12490
Description
When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.
Predictions
Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.
Mitigations
No mitigations published for this CVE yet.
The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or โ if you've already worked around this in production โ publish your fix to the community-verified tier.
โ Propose a mitigation on Community โ Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here withsource_tier=community-verified.
OS impact
Ubuntu Fixed 6 releases
| Version | Status | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| xenial | Fixed | 4.1.7-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
| resolute | Fixed | 4.14.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
| noble | Fixed | 4.8.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
| jammy | Fixed | 4.3.9-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
| focal | Fixed | 4.1.26-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
| bionic | Fixed | 4.1.17-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
References
CWEs
CWE-284 CWE-306
Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.
Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.